Quick links

IMPORTANT NOTICE/DISCLAIMER!
The results displayed here are NOT the official and final results of the tournament and must not be interpreted and/or seen as such. Players are sorted as per their final tournament scores and discarding all tiebreak scores.
The offical results are those that were published by the relevant organisers.
All tournaments prior to 2017 will be displayed as if they were Swiss tournaments.
As of 01 January 2017, tournaments will be displayed as Swiss, Round-Robin or Team (depending on the format of the tournament).

TOURNAMENT INFORMATION

Under 14
2009/08/03 to 2009/08/03
2009/08/03
7
Individual Swiss
Standard
No
 Ekurhuleni (GE)
Christelle Fisher
Elrich Grootboom
33 (1051.3)
33 (1051.3)

RESULTS AND RATING ANALYSIS

#/BrdNameFed/TeamLogoRatingTitleScoreR1R2R3R4R5R6R7AORDpPRatRpmAnalysis
1 De Gouveia, Dk (Dennis) GE 1189 -1.0 W+26 B+14 W+7 W+2 B+5 B-3 W=4 1151.3 243 1394 25.0 Full analysis
2 Spirou, V (Victor) GE 1316 -1.0 W+31 B+9 W+8 B-1 B+16 W+5 W=3 1129.1 243 1372 15.0 Full analysis
3 Wahl, M (Marnus) GE 1163 -1.0 W+23 B-17 W+13 B+7 W+9 W+1 B=2 1101.4 243 1344 42.0 Full analysis
4 Ferrie, K (Kirsten) GE 1028 -1.0 W+25 B-7 W+29 B+11 W+8 B+16 B=1 1026.6 242 1269 31.0 Full analysis
5 Fisher, M (Michelle) GE 1171 -1.0 B+32 W+6 B+20 W+17 W-1 B-2 W+12 1119.7 182 1302 27.0 Full analysis
6 Crawshaw, Sr (Shane) GE 1075 -1.0 W+13 B-5 W+12 B-9 W+21 B+11 W+15 1151.8 182 1334 38.0 Full analysis
7 Van Eyk, Ld (Luke) GE 1000 -1.0 B+21 W+4 B-1 W-3 B+10 B=8 W+16 1175.7 121 1297 59.0 Full analysis
8 Lombard, Jd (Jonathan) GE 1033 -1.0 B+27 W+10 B-2 W+20 B-4 W=7 W+9 1128.3 122 1250 44.0 Full analysis
9 Verster, D (Donovan) GE 1236 -1.0 B+18 W-2 B+10 W+6 B-3 W+13 B-8 1134.8 61 1196 -11.0 Full analysis
10 Du Toit, T (Tiaan) EK 1413 -1.0 W+29 B-8 W-9 B+14 W-7 B+23 B+18 1108.0 61 1169 -27.0 Full analysis
11 Pananis, M (Matthew) GE 1359 -1.0 B+19 W-16 B+22 W-4 B+20 W-6 B+21 1083.3 61 1144 -23.0 Full analysis
12 Du Toit, Cha (Charlene) EK 1441 -1.0 B-16 W+32 B-6 W+28 B+22 W+18 B-5 1053.1 61 1114 -32.0 Full analysis
13 Prinsloo, K (Kayla) GE 0 -1.0 B-6 W+27 B-3 B+26 W+19 B-9 W+24 982.6 60 1043 64.0 Full analysis
14 Lithgow, A (Amy-Sue) GE 1394 -1.0 B+24 W-1 B-21 W-10 B+30 W+22 B+19 1064.8 61 1126 -34.0 Full analysis
15 Watson, A (Ariel) GE 0 -1.0 W-20 B+26 B-19 W+27 B+24 W+17 B-6 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
16 Sithebe, I (Itumeleng) GE 963 -1.0 W+12 B+11 W=17 B+21 W-2 W-4 B-7 1204.8 0 1205 46.0 Full analysis
17 Slabbert, R (Ruben) GE 1140 -1.0 B+28 W+3 B=16 B-5 W-18 B-15 W+25 1024.3 0 1024 -26.0 Full analysis
18 Hattingh, E (Erene) GE 0 -1.0 W-9 B=25 W+31 W+19 B+17 B-12 W-10 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
19 Du Toit, A (Angelique) GE 0 -1.0 W-11 B+23 W+15 B-18 B-13 W+20 W-14 1080.4 -50 1030 54.0 Full analysis
20 Gopal, J (Jaynill) GE 1000 -1.0 B+15 W+22 W-5 B-8 W-11 B-19 W+28 1047.8 -50 998 -5.0 Full analysis
21 De Bruin, C (Calvin) GE 1453 -1.0 W-7 B+30 W+14 W-16 B-6 B+29 W-11 1080.6 -50 1031 -74.0 Full analysis
22 Moodley, Dj (Deran) GE 1371 -1.0 W+30 B-20 W-11 B+29 W-12 B-14 W+26 1078.8 -50 1029 -48.0 Full analysis
23 Kitching, I (Ivan) GE 0 -1.0 B-3 W-19 B=24 B+31 W=28 W-10 B+27 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
24 Coertze, A (Armand) GE 0 -1.0 W-14 B-29 W=23 B+25 W-15 B+28 B-13 929.1 -102 827 13.0 Full analysis
25 Terblanche, Lj (Lj) 0 -1.0 B-4 W=18 B-28 W-24 B+32 W+30 B-17 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
26 Hodge, T (Tiffany) GE 0 -1.0 B-1 W-15 B+32 W-13 W-29 B+31 B-22 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
27 Stroh, B (Bruce) GE 0 -1.0 W-8 B-13 W+30 B-15 W-31 B+32 W-23 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
28 Mckay, J (Joshua) GE 0 -1.0 W-17 B=31 W+25 B-12 B=23 W-24 B-20 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
29 Jardine, Tr (Tyler) GE 908 -1.0 B-10 W+24 B-4 W-22 B+26 W-21 B-30 1072.4 -158 914 -4.0 Full analysis
30 Cohen, M (Marco) GE 0 -1.0 B-22 W-21 B-27 W+32 W-14 B-25 W+29 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
31 Felix, M (Mathew) GE 0 -1.0 B-2 W=28 B-18 W-23 B+27 W-26 XXX 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
32 Isemonger, B (Brandon) GE 0 -1.0 W-5 B-12 W-26 B-30 W-25 W-27 +BYE 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis
33 Gopal, J (Jaynill) GE 1000 -1.0 XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 0.0 0 0 0.0 Full analysis